In relation to health and security training, one of the points that must be considered is whether you and/or your employees require an accredited or non-accredited training course. As with most things in life, there are advantages and disadvantages of each.
Course syllabus content
Accredited well being and security training courses such as the NEBOSH Certificates (Normal, Construction, Fire and Environmental), ConstructionSkills (SMSTS and SSSTS), IOSH (Managing, Working, Directing Safely) and so forth all have particular syllabuses which should be adopted so as to satisfy the assessment criteria. This signifies that there could also be large sections which are irrelevant for different people on the course and their explicit job position, which could lead to delegates changing into bored and "switching off". This won't be an issue for the part that is not related to them, but when they do not "re-interact" when relevant info is being taught, they run the risk of potentially lacking essential information. There is additionally a danger of distracting others on the course who do need to know what is being taught.
Not like accredited programs which, as mentioned above have to observe particular syllabuses, these that are not accredited may be tailored to an organisation's specific office hazards and working practices. This implies that the subject material is more likely to be much more relevant to these attending. A non-accredited course can even incorporate the organisation's well being and safety coverage and emergency procedures into the taught topic matter.
They might not be tailored, however do not forget the standing
An advantage of an accredited health and safety statement
training course is that only the suppliers who've been pre-authorised by the related awarding body are allowed to deliver their respective courses. This permits for greater peace of thoughts (extremely essential when parting with a large sum of money!), as teaching requirements have been assessed as meeting a certain standard and pass rates are constantly good.
The fact that syllabuses are constant and exams the same across providers, it signifies that those who have acquired the qualification can be thought to be having a high stage of competency and health and security knowledge as they've passed the required assessment, whereas a non-accredited qualification might have been awarded to somebody after attending a course which is far too straightforward and, more pertinently, doesn't provide the information necessary for working safely or managing others back in the workplace. Just because somebody has a nice trying certificates doesn't imply they could perform their position to the necessary requirement back within the workplace if they don't have the sufficient data to go with it. These with a real certificates from a recognised and well-revered awarding body can prove to others that they've this information just by showing the certificate.
But this status can come at a price. For those endeavor accredited well being and safety training, there is often a considerable amount of course materials and hefty textual contentbooks which are incorporated into the course worth or should be purchased as an added further, as well as exam registration and official certification fees. There may also be lengthy waits to receive examination outcomes and certificates after completing an accredited course, which can be significantly frustrating for individuals who require the qualification before starting or applying for jobs.
So in conclusion, neither accredited or non-accredited training will be outlined as "better", as it's suitmeans will depend not solely on the requirements of the person or firm requiring the training, but additionally on the standard of the training supplier who is delivering the course.